Evaluating the research process grading criteria hcs 465

The authors stated that usually the spread remains confined to the abdominal cavity and that imaging assessment of these mucinous lesions is difficult, while tumor markers CEA and CA Immunohistochemical IHC Analysis — Laboratory process of detecting an organism in tissues with antibodies.

It should be Pages. In men and in women who are not pregnant, an elevated level of AFP may indicate liver, ovarian or testicular cancer. These researchers determined the PCA3 score in these samples and correlated the results with the results of the prostate biopsies.

These organizations have concluded that serum CA levels are not sufficiently sensitive or specific for use as a screening test for ovarian cancer, and that the harms of such screening outweigh the benefits. A serious potential harm is the false-positive test result, which may lead to anxiety and invasive diagnostic procedures.

Most 96 percent patients with a CA increase of greater than 25 percent have disease progression.

Tumor Markers

A cutoff of The authors concluded that in men undergoing repeat prostate biopsy to rule out cancer, the urinary PCA3 score was superior to serum PSA determination for predicting the biopsy outcome.

Tosoian et al evaluated the relationship between PCA3 and prostate biopsy results in men in a surveillance program. These tumor markers were also of benefit in the assessment of prognosis in that a normal level indicated an improved prognosis. However, the literature indicates a wide variety of other cancers can produce elevated levels of this tumor marker, including melanoma; lymphoma; and cancers of the breast, lung, pancreas, stomach, cervix, bladder, kidney, thyroid, liver, and ovary.

These researchers developed a quantitative assay that can measure clinically relevant levels of thymosin B15 in human urine.

The literature states that elevated HCG levels may also indicate the presence of cancers of the testis, ovary, liver, stomach, pancreas, and lung.

HCS 465 Week 4 Individual Assignment - Evaluating the Research Process

The background statement answers the following questions: This also includes the infection rate, which can be quite serious for Similar to the CA antigen, CA is found in the blood of most breast cancer patients.

In contrast, the area under the curve for serum PSA was 0. Conversely, the growth rate of progressive disease can be monitored by serially measuring serum AFP concentrations over time.

The Task Force concluded that the potential harms of such screening outweigh the potential benefits. Do you have enough information to make a decision on the effectiveness of the study?. Posts about HCS University of Phoenix Learning Team Assignment written by homeworrkaid.

HCS Week 4, Evaluating the Research Process. Individual Assignment: Evaluating the Research Process • Resource: Evaluating the Research Process Grading Criteria. HCS/Health Care Research Utilization (Solved) June 26, Resource:Application of the Background and Methodology of the Research Process to Problems in.

HCS Week 4 Individual Assignment - Evaluating the Research Process University of Phoenix. Resource: Evaluating the Research Process Grading Criteria. Select one of the articles collected in the Week One Annotated Bibliography assignment.

Write a 1, to -1,word paper that evaluates the research process within your chosen article. Resource: Evaluating the Research Process Grading Criteria. Select one of the articles collected in the Week One Annotated Bibliography assignment.

Write a 1, to -1,word paper that evaluates the research process within your chosen article. UOP HCS HCS/ HCS Week 4 Individual Assignment Evaluating the Research Process Resource: Evaluating the Research Process Grading Criteria. • Select one of the articles collected in the Week One Annotated Bibliography assignment.

HCS Week 4 Individual Assignment: Evaluating the Research ProcessResource: Evaluating the Research Process Grading Criteria.• Select one of the articles collected in the Week One Annotated Bibliography assignment.•.

Evaluating the research process grading criteria hcs 465
Rated 4/5 based on 18 review
HCS Week 4 Individual Assignment - Evaluating the Research Process